Your words: "A close reading of 20th century history indicates as nothing else can loss of faith in the idea of the individual. It is only the individual, after all, that suffers. The group, does not suffer; only those who compose it..."
-
-
Again, the fact that professor Peterson's website will say "the class is corrupt: avoid" is in and of itself a form of "reason, facts, arguments, and evidence." Whether the individual chooses to agree/disagree is up to the him/her. Don't you think, more evidence the better?
-
Evidence, yes. Appeal to authority, whether in the form of AI, Dr. Peterson, or any other form, no.
-
I'm no fan of "Appeal to authority." But whether people believe use the website and its concluding remarks because of an AI or professor Peterson is an assumption that covers everyone, which I'm not ready to accept. Again, I think its up to the individual.
-
We both insist on the individual, in slightly different ways.
-
Cheers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is not an AI, rather a database, if you say about an AI it implies that it thinks for itself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.