Would a reasonably precise AI-based website devoted to identifying postmodern/Neomarxist courses/professors/disciplines for students do more
-
-
Come on, Jordan! Are you promoting group thinking now? Tribe mentality? Have you forgotten?https://youtu.be/YnEFt20qe0o?t=12m43s …
-
Your words: "A close reading of 20th century history indicates as nothing else can loss of faith in the idea of the individual. It is only the individual, after all, that suffers. The group, does not suffer; only those who compose it..."
-
"...Thus the reality of the individual must be regarded as primary if suffering is to be regarded seriously. Without such regard there can be no motivation to reduce suffering and therefore no respite."
-
"...Instead the production of individual suffering can and has and will again rationalized and justified for its supposed benefits for the FUTURE and the GROUP."
-
Are you now talking about Neomarxists and postmodernists as a GROUP, or as INDIVIDUALS? Who suffers? The group, or the individuals?
-
The benefits to the "group" of students outweigh the potential suffering of the individuals comprising the Neomarxists/postmodernists?
-
Good argument, but. Neo-Marxism and postmodernism aren't people. They're ideas. Are you arguing that postmodernists are inherently postmodern? If not, what about the "potential suffering" of postmodernists who suffer because of their ideology?
-
I am against the ideas, but for the people. Assigning the dirty work to an AI is a cop-out on the moral responsibility for their well-being as individuals.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Its only identifying the course content and political leanings of a professor. You are misinterpretting
-
I see your point, but let's have an AI accurately describe your political leanings to the general public and see what you think of that.
-
I wouldnt care. People mistake my intentions and ideals all the time already. I just stopped bothering to correct them
-
You would care if you were a professor and couldn't get hired because of it, let's say.
-
Well. These professors are not educating students at all. They are having them literally repeat what is said with little to no course work
-
If anything. This is a scam. And those kinds of people should NOT be working as educators at all
-
I agree. But they remain human beings with families that depend on them. Assigning the dirty work to an AI is absolving moral responsibility for their well-being.
-
Nothing would be stopping them from pursuing careers elsewhere aside from their own minds and stubbornness. Its on them for being so twisted
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Its not that modernism and science is dogmatic and static, criticism is an integral part of science and its the thing that makes is work and makes progress possible. The alternative to criticism is tyrrany.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Comuniștii nefiind oameni - nu merită ”benefit of the doubt”. De asemenea, luptatul cu onoare e rezervat doar oponenților onorabili. Încă o dată, nu e cazul cu comuniștii.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry, but your ideal world compromised of hyper-vigilant, hyper-intelligent, intrinsically morally good skeptics doesn't exist, which is ironic because postmodern/Neomarxist doctrines also erroneously assume the same worldview. Nice attempt to strawman Dr. Peterson though lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.