Does anyone know of any hypothesis on why humans tend not to consider "cost of time" in their decision making? Thanks.
-
-
5/E.g. intuitively knowing how long an activity takes is a conditioned response based on previous experience with said activity.
-
6/If the physical attributes change we cannot intuitively predict, anticipate, or quantify time without relying on second order thinking.
-
7/Future projection/anticipation requires the representation of memory, which belongs to second-order thinking (thought about thought).
-
8/Time as an object (quantifiable/measurable) can be related spacially -as an object or property- only in second order thinking...
-
9/... E.g. as a representation of one's own (or other's) experience. FIN
-
Thanks, I understand your point, it explains how is it we don’t perceive correctly time.
-
I wonder why we are not able to. A possibility:if perceiving time cost was valuable, we would be able to. If we don’t, it must be it isn’t.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
