0. As usual, @naval asks a seemingly simple question with impossibly difficult implications. It's Sunday, I've got time, so thread.https://twitter.com/naval/status/891586520661934081 …
-
-
... Although I find it very difficult to define what "beneficial" is within this context. What do you understand as beneficial?
-
I meant it in the context of natural selection. Tho I'd say that the same biases that are beneficial to evolution also make us act in a way…
-
…that is beneficial to our self (pleasure, etc) in a way that doesn't benefit fitness to selection (as long as it doesn't impair it).
-
I see your point. My sense is that the more evolved the analytical mind becomes the further it diverges from the experiential mind...
-
... therefore causing an evolutionary "maladaption" which does not benefit its selection and propagation in the gene pool.
-
I agree with both points. I'd add that such misadaptation is actually beneficial in the short term, but also fragile; experiential is anti-f
-
I.e. in your first sentence, instead of "evolved", "optimized".
-
Very good point, and it is more accurate to say "optimized" instead of "evolved". How do you reconcile this though?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Definitely.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.