Wrong, the nature of self is like the elephant that can't be seen all at once, not something that can't be seen at all.
To define something is to differentiate it. That is the mind, not awareness. When you are in a state of non-differentiation, who are you?
-
-
Define "state of non-differentiation". I am only aware of one "state" and it is called existence
-
See?You think you need to define it to understand.My question was pointing exactly to that. It's not about defining, it's about experiencing
-
Defining is experiencing if you are a human; the pattern of this definition is your self
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Most of who "you" are and what "you" do is be a passenger on a train of biological momentum millions of years in the making
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You don't define things, things define themselves. You attach meaning to relationships and patterns and that meaning is a "definition"
-
Every word is subject to all words and definitions known by the person, the amalgam of which is "the self" and a mirror of existence
-
What is mirrored and is true of existence is, to the subject, "reality"; all else is categorized as "fantasy"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.