Understanding Jungian cognitive functions will not tell you who you are. It will give you an objectively verifiable framework for understanding how your mind works. This subtle but crucial point makes all the difference, and is missed by every criticism of it I have come across.
This is more or less the way I view it. These phenomena are consistent across domains, hence, an objective reality. If a model can synthesize from a few data points to accurately predict traits and behaviors, it is both objective, and falsifiable.
-
-
Okay, I think we are mostly in agreement. My only problem is with your use of 'predict' and 'falsifiable' and 'objective' when, in my view, analysis of mental phenomena can at best be of a 'descriptive' nature, a domain separate from that of scientific analysis
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.