Information retention is non-linear; it requires the creation of multiple access points to the same data, or a web of interconnected neural pathways. The benefit of thinking for yourself is it sticks with you; it is the mechanism by which your own data relates to new information.
-
-
Replying to @mistermircea
Do you believe we can think completely by ourselves?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @mistermircea
Agreed. Collective stimulation conditionates process. We use language to think. Its methods and structure, along with the limitations derived from these, were given to us. The foundations of thought were never an individual creation. Neither its exercising.
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @gxdarz
Pretty much. Language, to me, is in a sense, everything. That being said, there are deeper layers of cognition which exist prior to it, and that is what I am interested in understanding.
3 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @mistermircea
The walled maze . The abstract network flowing from perception. How would we think without language? How would our understanding of the world be? Even more fascinating, how language boosted self-awareness, consciousness? Language creates bridges with existence and burns them.
4 replies 2 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @gxdarz @mistermircea
The language you use defines the ontological domain you can communicate, and thus, explore and build upon.
4 replies 4 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @archaicstory @mistermircea
Two people, same word, different worlds. Two people, different word, same worlds. "At bottom I am only interested in what cannot be sent off, cannot be dispatched in any case" - Jacques Derrida. It seems we have something in common.
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes
Yes, not a coincidence me and Derrida share the same psychological type.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.