Whenever the inferior is challenged it tries to come across as a strength, which is easily detectable by those who have the same function in a higher position, therefore it is not convincing, with few exceptions.
-
-
Replying to @mistermircea @realmalone
You raise an interesting point with your observation about Ne and it is one I share. My current understanding is that Ne is more like a property than an attribute. It presents possibility as object, therefore you (and I) as subject are always one step removed from it.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
-
Replying to @mistermircea @realmalone
Forget Te (assuming it's your tertiary). Use Fi to drill into Ne. IME rookie mistake (mine, too) to try and synergize functions with the same orientation early on. That's god-level development. Leverage the low-hanging fruit first, Te only as energizer/excitation source.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @startupdaemon @realmalone
Again, a very Te comment/approach. I understand your point, however it is more difficult to drill into Ne with Fi than to understand the complementary role that Te plays to Fi. The purpose of the former is also different than the purpose of the latter.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
As to forgetting it, that is impossible in tertiary emergence and if one were to attempt so it would only frustrate it even more.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.