As its essence is emptiness, it is free from eternalism. As its nature is clarity, it is free from nihilism. As its capacity is ceaseless, it is the basis of various manifestations. These are divided as three but in meaning they are indivisible. Jigme Lingpa
That is the standard presentation, but I don't think that really elaborates on your original point responding to Chagmé's questions. I'd be interested to hear you elaborate. Eg: Does 'sems nyid' imply a state free of thought? Does "mind is timeless" reflect an eternalise stance?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Do you mean novel to you, or novel in a broader context?
- 3 more replies
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.