An interesting observation this evening in a conversation where "getting old" was a topic, yet the concept seemed difficult to relate to in the context of unchanging experiencing. I suddenly realized I had actually become identified with being this unchanging display experiencing
-
-
Replying to @JimWray
Do you see this as a potential ‘eternalistic’ pitfall - a denial of your basic humanity - or is this identification something you find is helpful and desirable? Does your model rely on some sort of continuity of ‘clear’ after human body dies? Thanks Jim. Always interesting!
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm really not clear why so many spiritual types are convinced that everything dies with the body and use eternal as a criticism. The body dies, stuff dies with it, but that everything dies, not justified imo.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Sure - but I’ve met plenty of people who take the possibility of something not dying, and cling onto it with a death-grip, thus driving their behaviour and beliefs in all sorts of funny directions. It actually amplifies their suffering and anxiety. It can remain open hypothesis.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
There is a point, in my experience, where you will "find out". That said, all bodies are bodies, whether physical or not, and they will all end.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
to rest in the eternal you have to give up everything non eternal. And for most people that's everything they think they are.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes - this is very good practice advice i think, but I’m not sure whether one can then take up a philosophical stance as a result of such experience....that seems to represent a sign if any leap, epistemologically speaking. I’ve always been a lousy philosopher anyway
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Typo: significant leap*
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.