I guess that depends on how many empirically unverifiable metaphysical truth propositions and invisible people you involve in your practice of it (?)https://twitter.com/adamfrei/status/948663637471875081 …
-
-
Replying to @chakathemighty
Buddhism is a source of spirituality that encourages critical thinking and self exploration. Buddhism however does not serve to make everybody "think" the things you "think".
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fuzzylogic8250
Not arguing doctrinal or personal agreement. I am inquiring into the use of the word "realism" in the context of the many "Buddhisms" that people (me too) practice. "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chakathemighty @fuzzylogic8250
Or maybe: "Do you think it means what the agreed upon meaning of the word means?"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chakathemighty @fuzzylogic8250
Even my own conceptualization and articulation of a pre-sectarian source code/Dhamma.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chakathemighty
I think "realism" is basic tenet of Buddhism going back to the Four Noble Truths and the understanding of the true nature of things.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fuzzylogic8250 @chakathemighty
Many spirituals paths focus on what can not be proved to exist and have faith in that (heaven). Buddhism is about what does simply exist and understanding that. It would be interesting to ask a Lama about the concept that they practice "seeing invisible people" :D
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
what's an invisible person? Could you explain what it is you're intending to mean here please. Much obliged.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.