20 patients in a study is never good science.
-
-
Replying to @sz_duras
I thought that was just the most recent study? Of course it's not definitive, it's a test study! Good science is a long process, it's not a one off magic-bullet study. They exist, but it's fucking rare. Science journalism should make that clearer. This is still important work.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
"Future research with more rigorous controls should serve to challenge and develop the present study’s findings and inferences." aka - 'ok, not a complete waste of time...so let's do more science guise!'
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @misen__
we can fully expect people to use the pseudo-science to justify drug use. The samples are too small to deserve the category of science.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sz_duras
who needs pseudo-science to justify drug use? Life justifies drug use,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @misen__
laughs, so the proponents of recreational drugs have always said. But some people will believe anything...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sz_duras
who said anything about recreation? I think it should be mandatory initiatory rite.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @misen__
like so many things young people are encouraged to do by the
#spectacle it turns out to be incredibly bad for you...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sz_duras
yeah, well that situationist bullshit was farted out of the brain of a suicidal Frenchman who probably would have benefitted from some psychedelic assisted therapy himself.
Anyway, I've enjoyed this exchange. A welcome distraction from the horror of psychedelic flashbacks.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.