Touche'...and yet, this non-dual perspective contains the oppositional tension that gives rise to creative energy
-
-
Replying to @cognazor
Yes... but in my experience when in this non-dual perspective, harmony/fluidity/flow/frequency seem to be far better descriptors than opposition or tension (there could be some, but very subtle). In a dualistic POV those are very apparent & dominant.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JaredJanes
I love the oppositional creative tension that this discussion is generating! :P
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @JaredJanes
Dude, you are so angry right now, just admit it. ADMIT IT!!!!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cognazor
Hahaha, definitely an energetic urge to express/share my experience
& maybe a dash of frustration with words
but not much more 
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
-
Replying to @cognazor
I don't think we are really disagreeing fundamentally... the phrase 'not one, not two' is coming up for me.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JaredJanes @cognazor
I feel like this has a zen origin...
@bodhidave3?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
IIRC, neither one nor many is standard Madhyamaka stuff (see: Madhyamakālaṃkāra), but there may be popular Zen derivatives from that.
-
-
yes, both traditions pay attention to ways we can over-do (over-conceptualize/ -deny) either the "all is one" view or the notion that things are separate. Dōgen, I recall, speaks of "cutting things into one."
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
