"You know what is curious about Trungpa's presentation of Dharma Art, is that he doesn't start with awareness or something. He starts at a person with a sense of humour. Then they perceive the wide open sky, and within that space they appreciate the play & symbolism of phenomena"
-
Show this thread
-
"It is the non-aggression of humour which cuts through the separation of self and other, self and world, ego and awareness. All that duality is cut through by humour." (notes from transcribed conversation with a mentor - discussing art, poetry & symbolism in everyday life)
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Been talking to a friend about practicing with a sense of discovery and humour, instead of various other styles of engagement. I'm starting to suspect that a sense of enjoyment & poetic appreciation might be a gateway to that way of perceiving (but it is not without problems)
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Mi'sen Retweeted Mi'sen
Mi'sen added,
Mi'sen @misen__Contemplative fieldnote: An aesthetic triad: • play • skill • beauty Thinking of meditation as something deadly serious is spiritual materialism, it’s dead. Working with emotions and confusion is a considerable matter, be we can lighten up a bit. Why so serious? pic.twitter.com/qX4aTueJIEShow this thread1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
After going over the transcript I picked up the Trungpa text he was alluding to. I suspect it is probably one of his least accessible works. Unfortunately I only know a few practitioners who take this topic seriously as a powerful way of engaging with and enriching life.
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @misen__
I found it opaque the first time through. Later, oral explanations from Ngak’chang Rinpoche made it make sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
Oh that's interesting. If I may, were the oral explanations technical in nature, or would you say they were more personal — in the context of your student:teacher relationship — which opened up the possibility for Trungpa's teaching to make sense?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @misen__
Neither of those mainly. Rather about the same topic, ie the nature of art as seen from a vajra perspective. There was a period about ten years ago when that was the main thing he taught. He had a lot of difficulty finding a way of presenting it that students could get...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @misen__
Eventually that material got absorbed into his autobiography _an odd boy_ as stealth dharma. I’m not sure anyone understood it that way either. I think I probably understood it mainly through working with him one-on-one on aesthetic projects.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Ah ok. That makes sense, especially understanding it through working on projects together. I might try his stealth dharma and see if I can glean any more via that route. I know of one person who is uniquely suited to ask about this, but they're normally very busy & hard to reach.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.