Eight years ago I ranted about the baleful hegemony of “Consensus Buddhism”—which boiled down to “It’s nice to be nice. Also, mindfulness.” And I suggested it was imploding. It’s over now! And diverse, more-substantive alternatives are emerging.https://vividness.live/2011/12/31/one-dharma-whose/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Whereas the political hegemony of Consensus Buddhism is visibly over, its memetic dominance lingers. In particular, all the new alternatives seem to be mostly recycling mid-20th-century export Theravada. Harder-core versions maybe, but can’t we find other sources of inspiration?
5 replies 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Of course, but some serious rethinking is required.https://soundcloud.com/imperfect-buddha-podcast/52-ibp-critical-turn-1 …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes. Excellent point. In fact I was going to go on to rant about that but figured everyone had had more than enough ranting already
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
More rants.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
I was going to say that Buddhist innovation has always started with a creative misreading of scripture. You need to understand what problem the author was trying to solve in their historical context, and find an analogy with the problem you have in your historical context.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @OortCloudAtlas and
(This requires understanding scripture as written by people struggling with historically-situated cultural problems, rather than Ultimate Truths From God. I think most Buddhist innovators, going back 2000+ years, have at least semi-understood this.)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @OortCloudAtlas and
So you deliberately misread the text as suggesting solutions to your different problem. If there’s a structural analogy that works, this is productive. Especially when you try to turn it into a new way of meditating.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @OortCloudAtlas and
Exhibit A is the invention of modern meditation by creatively misreading Pali Abhidhamma, which is speculative metaphysics, as if it were meditation instructions, which it isn’t.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @OortCloudAtlas and
In a close parallel, early tantra was invented in large part by misreading Mahayana Buddhological metaphysics as meditation instructions. (It’s interesting to speculate about why this worked, in both cases, but it would just be speculation…)
2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes
Do you have any ideas for how the visionary/terma type innovation fits in to this creative misreading? Pragmatic post-hoc justification?
-
-
Replying to @misen__ @OortCloudAtlas and
I think it’s inseparable. As
@OortCloudAtlas mentioned in the podcast, the people who invented modern Theravadan meditation were doing just like tertons, sitting in caves and having visions of dakinis who gave them the practices.2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @OortCloudAtlas and
Took me a couple of minutes to make the connection, but that makes sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.