Religions almost all started as paths. It is, for example, useful to believe in certain types of God. It has personal or social utility. (I could write a 10K essay on this topic.) But what are, in Buddhist terms "expedient means" get reified into dogma.
Yes, I know one person who is looking at slightly more sensible ways of making use of the guru model, but it’s rather early days and quite experimental, although it seems to be having a positive effect for some of the students, especially those who grok the idea of ‘inner guru’
-
-
a lot of folks are trying to fix the teacher/gurua/abuse issue. Hope they do, but I'm wondering how they'll keep the juice.
-
Yes, unfortunately it seems that many of the reworkings are influenced by identity politics in a way which may be unproductive in the context of contemplative training/practice. Will be interesting to see what works, if anything
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.