You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Interesting question. I look forward to reading what you come up with. I don’t really have much to say on top of what has been said by those better read than myself, but I’d suggest not taking any Buddhist system too seriously, as a teacher once said to me...(1)
...’any explanation - whether from Shakyamuni, or some Dzogchen yogin - will always be somewhat in inverted commas.’ We can say certain things, but the answer is never quite coherent, never quite accurate...but that perhaps is preferable to not saying anything.(2)
The only other thinngs which come to mind immediately: • I’ve never read a secular account that I found any more elucidating than that of the weirdo mystical shmystical folk. • This misses your point, but; three marks/four-seals doesn’t say there is ‘no self’. • good luck!
Yes, excellent! This is why I believe any reconstructed Buddhism has to be meta-systematic; no system can be credible as such anymore.
No claim (e.g. about “the self”) can be credible in isolation, either. One has to explain its role in a conceptual context, and the limitations of that context.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
