Yes. It will be interesting to see what happens to the Tibetan religious community en masse as the oldest generation departs. Namkhai Norbu was for me the most interesting - due to his clear presentation of systems as method. Unlike others, his presentations were meta-systematic.
-
… and it’s basically always sutra pretending to be Dzogchen. Approximately no one teaches actual Dzogchen. Which is why it’s so tempting to attempt it oneself… a bad idea for so many reasons.
-
-
Hmm… Many other things get repackaged and sold as Dzogchen. Usually it’s easiest to recognize that the “Dzogchen” is specifically something else (Madhyamaka, Paramitayana, tantric ngöndro, funerary ritual, …). Otherwise, you need to be able to recognize Dzogchen; that’s harder.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Often it’s detectable in highly familiar renunciate language of overcoming craving and desire, attachment as negativity, focus on suffering - all of that is Sutric in origin. Overcoming anything is not Dzogchen in flavour.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.