"The most important feature of this approach, for our purposes here, is that experience is not seen as an epiphenomenal side issue, but is considered central to any adequate understanding of the mind, and accordingly needs to be investigated in a careful phenomenological manner."
-
Show this thread
-
"Phenomenology and experimental cognitive science are thus seen as complementary and mutually informing modes of investigation. NP builds on this view with the specific aim of understanding the nature of consciousness and subjectivity and their relation to the brain and body."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
"On the one hand, it stands to reason that people vary in their abilities as observers and reporters of their own mental lives, and that these abilities can be enhanced through mental training of attention, emotion, and metacognition."
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
"Contemplative practice is a vehicle for precisely this sort of cognitive and emotional training. On the other hand, it stands to reason that mental training should be reflected in changes to brain structure, function, and dynamics."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
"Hence, contemplative practice could become a research tool for developing better phenomenologies of subjective experience and for investigating the neural correlates of consciousness."
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
"Were such research to prove fruitful, adept contemplatives could become a new kind of scientific collaborator, rather than simply a new type of experimental participant, for their first-person expertise would be directly mobilized within scientific research on the mind."
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @AE_Robbert
what insights might emerge from utilizing the skills and experiences of adept contemplatives?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chagmed
On a general level, I’d say they contribute (a) descriptions of first-person experience that also include what the subject contributes to the construction of those experiences & (b) some means of expressing descriptions in ways that could circulate back into third-person methods.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AE_Robbert @chagmed
Limitations aside, this is - as I understand it - part of what Shinzen has been working on. ie: a system & language of contemplative training informed by basic science, which is easier to codify in data sets, standardised subjective reporting, blah blah. Ambitious project.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @misen__
fair enough. one of my concerns is blind spots, e.g., cognitive bias. you can be an expert contemplative and still remain blind to the biases of cognition.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Yes, we've talked about this in length but always worth repeating. I'm not a scientist but I have to assume there are significant blind spots both on part of the expert contemplatives and the expert researchers. Very Smart People do silliness, lots.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.