In light of @KennethFolk's recent PSA - reminding us that nirvāṇa=insentience - I'd like to recommend some reading, as a logical question to ask is:
Why not suicide?
@sarahdoingthing's 'Every Cradle is a Grave: Rethinking the Ethics of Birth and Suicide' is great on this topic
-
-
For me personally, the teachings of Shinzen and the Mahamudra tradition have been helpful in framing Zero in such a way that it doesn't just become depressing nihilism - they reflect the inseparability of experience and non-expereince, vivid and empty. Others like other stuff.
Show this thread -
People resist this notion of nirvana as Zero, perhaps because they can see the duality of experience and non-experience. Later Buddhisms make practical use of this duality. So we may ask, how does the acceptance of non-experience - zero - impact my experience? What does it do?
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
Yes -- and how we frame zero / emptiness implicates how we frame awakening and liberation. Easy to lose ourselves in attempts to find some 'absolute frame' and overcommit to particular frames and, in doing so, fail to acknowledge the flexibility of frames themselves.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.