Contemplative field-note: [A friend suggested I share something I said in private. I was hesitant - because it sounds incoherent to me - but here it is, lightly edited] 1
-
-
A Very Smart Person could analyse this at a high level and get very specific, communicating complex ideas simply and cogently - a powerful skill - but the practitioner doesn't need this capacity quite so much. 11
Show this thread -
What we do need is a willingness to question our assumptions & capacity to feel the stickiness/coagulation of emotional sensations when we relate to ideas. I can't think that clearly about this - yes that sucks - but I can notice some of the psycho-physical tensions at play. 12
Show this thread -
This is a key attentional skill in formal practice, but it also plays a key role in noticing how we relate informally to the various systems of contemplative training. Emotions run high on the boundaries....notice that. 13
Show this thread -
If you can notice when you reach for something in a mental model, you can think about it, but you can also notice what it feels like. Cognitive dissonance has an emotional texture, cognitive conviction has an emotional texture. Notice that. 14
Show this thread -
Next time you're in a debate or conversation about something that you deem important, look at your own experience. What's happening? Perhaps you can't analyse it that clearly, but you can always develop attentional capacity. 15
Show this thread -
Summary: A) Critical thinking is v.important. (Duh, right?) B) Not everyone can be Very Smart, but nearly everyone can pay attention to their experience. C) You can use the basic willingness to be critical/question in order to notice cognitive dissonances and convictions. 16/16
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.