Just released another conversation with Rob Burbea. We attempt to clarify and make useful distinctions between his body of work (called The Soulmaking Dharma) and your more typical Three Trainings Style Buddha Dharma.https://anchor.fm/emerge/episodes/Rob-Burbea-Responds-to-Reddit-e1vm3d …
-
-
Jason, what you said reminds me of something Shinzen said about emptiness that it’s like biting into an apple, initially flat and tasteless, but then sweet and rich and nourishing. I suspect it’s not how emptiness ‘is’, but presenting it that way sets the groove in our psyche.
-
I thought Rob’s distinction from tantra was curious - obviously it is different in a bunch of ways, but it seems to have a similar sort of function in terms of going beyond emptiness - ‘free to play’ as he said. Anyway, thanks for doing the podcast - super interesting stuff.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes! Rob said in both conversations that what enabled him to create the imaginal was practicing with a particular conception of emptiness and taking it all the way. Without this clarity in conception, the discovery of the imaginal would not have been possible.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right! I think the tendancy to simplify and secularize is a good one. Differentiation is helpful and necessary. But eventually there needs to be reintegration. As Rob would say, of desire, relationships, activism, poetry, etc., things that might have been discarded previously
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

