So, things I agree with: - Only an accomplished practitioner can say what something is really like, experientially. Things I disagree with: - Accomplished practitioners are qualified to deal in absolutes. How do they know what does or doesn't end? I don't see how they could.
Of course, I need to pay more attention to the downsides to open discussion though. This is something I’m noticing more recently. I lean so heavily to the side of openness that I’ve become somewhat insensitive to potential risk. Important lesson to be learnt there, I suspect.
-
-
good will on both sides is generally necessary, and there needs to be enough common ground. Sindre and I have both.
-
There is also the effect on your public image, at some point. But I block obnoxious trolls, and I don't have 100000 followers, so I don't see much reason to care about that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
It’s also cool to see how people approach this stuff differently - I find it helps me notice blind spots in my own practice/life/behaviour etc.