Gav it’s making sure we never get another Logan Paul. It’s just not worth the risk to have any more youtubers on the off chance they may become a Logan Paul. We’re calling it Douchegenics.
-
-
-
Problem is: There's already another Logan Paul that exists.https://twitter.com/JViscoNJ/status/953326230987771904 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thought I would start my YouTube channel this month. Guess it'll wait
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now you see you’d think this would be the solution but That would involve common sense and we just don’t know what that is here at youtube
-
This is a solution but it is also a reduction of money so...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sounds about right, though I'm sure they will have a much more over the top excuse for it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's almost like they are trying to get things wrong on purpose. I fail to see how nobody at
@Youtube would have stuck up their hand and asked "and this helps, how?!?" - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Starting channels under the requirements earn little to nothing, and being monetized hardly helps them in algorithms, since they have so few views. The thing is there so many of these channels who individually don't lose much that channels above the requirements 1/2
-
Yes, by metrics most sub those requirements make <$2.50/Mo or <$9.00/Month but I guess that's more important to YouTube than giving people even the smallest of incentives beyond a "one day maybe you can be big enough to matter" statement.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.