Great idea, but "art is not numerically measurable" is basically the antithesis of why Metacritic does what it does.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what we need is a rating system where 5/10 is average and everything above is good.
-
I rather have pro and con lists but people are to lazy reading/only care about a score to compare w/other games
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
On a scale of 1 to lemon, I call any 1-10 or 1-100 rating system pointless!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"this statue weighs 350kg, therefore is better than the 200kg one" - yeah, doesn't work
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I dunno, I think anyone can give a personal numeric value for anything. Getting the averages though makes no sense.
-
everyone scores in their own way, with their own systems. 5 stars at site a doesn't mean 10 at site B etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's why they say that art is priceless. You can't just measure it's value in any kind of currency. :P
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think Rotten Tomatoes' "approval rating" system is a lot more useful, the Metacritic system always seemed arbitrary.
-
They still have a big stinkin percentage at the top of their page tho
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.