@miracleofsound Nope. It just tells you that you can't have an intellegent debate with that person. In a way, it saves time.
-
-
-
@vissenekku haha, that's true actually
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@miracleofsound Even the qualification of "No evidence exists to support X" has a few more steps beyond personal experience.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@onetruecathal <- Our next dinner conversation!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@onetruecathal pffft if women want to time travel why don't they just build their own Dr Brown
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@miracleofsound I'd say 'I've never seen it, it never happened to me, so I am hardly the one to judge'Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@miracleofsound I say "I've never seen it, so it probably doesn't happen", but I also change my opinion if they can support their claims.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@miracleofsound it's also used by a LOT of Atheists. -
@ZeRootOfAllEvil Eh, thats different. You can prove most denied real things through evidence but not God hallucinations. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.