Making Up Minds

@minds_making

A website and blog about mind, consciousness, and artificial intelligence. By .

Canada
Vrijeme pridruživanja: kolovoz 2019.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @minds_making

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @minds_making

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 1. velj
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 1. velj
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 31. sij

    If I were faced with a difficult philosophical problem, I would simply say that no such problem exists.

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    This is very much a first draft, and there were so many cool suggestions over the past couple that I’m still thinking through

    Poništi
  6. 30. sij

    Updated with a few additional comments about Stuart Russell's scenario.

    Poništi
  7. 29. sij

    Time to take a giant gulp of coffee and check the timeline before starting this new book.

    Poništi
  8. 29. sij

    Some discussion of new books by Stuart Russell and Susan Schneider ().

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    Man goes to doctor. Says he's can't control his emotions. Says the trials of life are hard to bear. Doctor says, "Treatment is simple. Great stoic Pigliucci is in town tonight. Go and see him. He'll set you straight." Man bursts into tears. Says, "But doctor... I am Pigliucci"

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    Has anyone written anything that’s worth reading on the relationship between Russelian monism and nondualism (especially as it occurs in Mahāyāna Buddhist traditions)?

    Poništi
  11. 24. sij

    Leaning more and more towards externalism myself.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 24. sij

    , you might be interested in this if you haven't seen it already.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 24. sij

    "(a) making the case that some of our internal representations are inaccurate, (b) claiming that we don’t actually have some of the experiences we consciously think we have, or (c) asserting that an ethereal, ghost-like sense of self is illusory are...trivial arguments."

    Poništi
  14. 24. sij

    Where do you all fall on the internalism/externalism debate?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    If the claim is that consciousness is real but just not what we think it is then that is weak illusionism; if the claim is that there is legit no consciousness then may the Flying Spaghetti Monster grant thee mercy and deliverance from Zombiehood ;)

    Poništi
  16. 21. sij

    He also has a follow-up paper on the same topic from 2005:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 21. sij

    Van Gelder uses belief as an example where pluralism can give a clearer and more precise account than more mainstream theories do.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 21. sij

    Been reading William James lately and thinking about pluralism, and Van Gelder makes a strong, clear case for it. So much stagnancy in the mind-body debate going back decades, and pluralism sheds the assumptions that lead to so many problems.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 21. sij

    This is a really excellent paper (from 1998) by on pluralism and the mind-body debate.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    I read this paper by ⁦⁩ at the beginning of my career as a philosopher. It forever altered my conception of what philosophy can do and what it’s for. Every philosopher should know these points.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·