Last night, a miracle happened on @joinClubhouse:
A sane, informative discussion between political rivals on social media.
@chesaboudin crashed a discussion hosted by @micsolana and @michelletandler and I wrote a couple thousand words about it here:https://reasonableefforts.substack.com/p/miracle-at-the-clubhouse …
-
-
Replying to @mikewavsz @JoinClubhouse and
Wow, what a piece! Thank you!!
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @michelletandler @JoinClubhouse and
Glad you liked it! still admiring your grace under pressure, and i’m excited for future talks!
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mikewavsz @michelletandler and
Your piece peddles the same misinfo that the host has circulated (and partially retracted) associated with the Dec tragedy. You don’t square your dislike of the DA with crime increases in major cities of the USA in 2020. It’s almost like you are just anti criminal justice reform
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nicedwarf @michelletandler and
I’m not sure how what you’re saying bears any relationship to what I wrote. Can you please point me to any specific language in the piece you believe is “misinfo” or “anti-criminal justice reform”?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mikewavsz @michelletandler and
nick edwards Retweeted
Sure. You include the tweet from Solana/Tandler, which fanned recent anti-DA flames. Not including her follow up on the subject https://twitter.com/michelletandler/status/1349109636897546241?s=20 … seems disingenuous and allows misinformation to perpetuate.
nick edwards added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nicedwarf @michelletandler and
mmm idk I appreciate you reading my work, but the point I’m making stands with or without their tweet—it’s included only to show that they’ve “focused their ire... on Chesa.” Which it does. so if your only gripe is stylistic, I’d appreciate you not calling me disingenuous.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mikewavsz @michelletandler and
Does it? Ignoring her realization that she may have overreacted to incorrect facts seems relevant to any discussion of crime in SF and reactions to a reformist DA. Thx for listening.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The article was not about “crime in SF and reactions to a reformist DA.” It was about social media revitalizing debate between political rivals. The specific views of those rivals are wholly irrelevant. I applaud your defense of your guy, but your point here is a non sequitur.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.