They haven’t had a need to until recently. How can you be so sure they won’t/can’t?
He’s only been not allowed to monetize the videos where he’s hocking the “socialism is for fags” shirts. He’s still able to post. On the flip, isn’t the other side just as guilty of violating free speech when you try to tell YouTube they have to do something w/ their platform?
-
-
I haven’t been tracking their statements, and I’d agree (as I did with xdck) that legally compelling YT would be a 1st A (and 5A) violation, not a 1A defense. But the 1A “doesn’t shield you[tube] from criticism or consequences.” Users have a right to complain about features.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.