I actually like your East, West, and North divisions. The South divisions might as well just be called AL and NL Afterthoughts.pic.twitter.com/16SmTzzNjH
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
I actually like your East, West, and North divisions. The South divisions might as well just be called AL and NL Afterthoughts.pic.twitter.com/16SmTzzNjH
Yeah, it's not great. Went through a few iterations and there was always a misfit toys division in each league.
In 1961 the Washington Senators became the Minnesota Twins. You might want to double check your expansion history....
There were two Washington Senators franchises. 1901-60 Senators became the Twins. Expansion Senators from 1961-71 became the Rangers.
When did the MN Twins join MLB? I thought that was '61 when the Senators moved. And an expansion Senators was then created and they moved to Texas in '72.
That's what happened. 1901-60 Senators became the Twins, then 1961-71 Senators became the Rangers.
This was a fun read. I would go with Charlotte over San Antonio personally (nearly identical metropolitan areas), and I agree with Tampa Bay to Montreal. If I were doing the divisions I would go with something like this (although some may not like the central/south thing).pic.twitter.com/PODy4vXeN5
Didn't pick the easiest expansion team (San Antonio) in order to realign divisions...
Those west division make too much sense.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.