This is a thoughtful take on the whole Basecamp situation: https://www.baldurbjarnason.com/2021/you-are-what-you-do/ …pic.twitter.com/0xKHCrm0rs
Możesz dodawać lokalizację do Twoich Tweetów, jak miasto czy konkretne miejsce, z sieci lub innych aplikacji. W każdej chwili możesz usunąć historię lokalizacji swoich Tweetów. Dowiedz się więcej
"People are what they do. You are what you do. Let your actions be informed by what you read and hear, but always apply ideas with a critical and experimental mindset."
– @fakebaldurpic.twitter.com/PRcJTI7XPL
This is a good time to reflect: "Do my actions reflect my values?" "Do the people I follow, read, and support online reflect my values?"https://twitter.com/mijustin/status/1155484069590794240 …
Indie makers, leaders, tech workers, founders, writers, podcasters, creators... It's what we repeatedly do that matters. Every action is a vote for the kind of person we'll be.https://twitter.com/JamesClear/status/1212366465678151680 …
For those of us who share our thoughts/opinions with the world, this is a sobering reminder:
"Act like a scientist, not like a preacher.” (@AdamMGrant)
The problem with preaching strong beliefs is that it closes you off. You're not open to correction. You become entrenched.
For those of us who looked up to Jason and David, wrestling with this stuff is uncomfortable. Basecamp's example is what inspired many of us to build our own companies. But truthfully, this was a parasocial relationship. We didn't really *know* them. We only saw one side.
"Parasocial relationships may be the most important psychological effect of the modern tech era.
In our minds, we believe that we “know” someone that we don’t." – @edzitron
https://ez.substack.com/p/how-parasocial-relationships-have …pic.twitter.com/Vh6637L1Qs
people are still resolving the cognitive dissonance created by this situation...
I invested a lot of time in converting to a @heyhey email identity -- which now feels toxic.
This situation has damaged the small maker community in ways that are still unraveling.
they've pretty clearly illustrated some of the risks of relying on smaller companies for critical infrastructure -- we already know the problems with relying on larger companies for infra -- surveillance, monopoly, etc. but I certainly had a blind eye to this risk
Their success gave them soapboxes. Pretty much any company or project will coast along just fine with mediocre leadership. As opposed to hard skills, mediocrity in management is only revealed in adversity.
Can't wait to hear yours and Jon's thoughts on it all. A little strange that you shared an Overcast link for the show and not a Transistor link though
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.