Clubhouse doesn’t feel like it should be even close to that kind of acquisition price. Facebook bought: Instagram – $1 billion Oculus – $2 billion WhatsApp – $19 billion Giphy – $400 millionhttps://twitter.com/Keith_Wasserman/status/1357697913904717824 …
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
I think a $10B valuation is way too high: - Clubhouse still feels more like a feature that fits on top of an existing graph (Twitter, FB, etc) - Clubhouse currently has no path to monetization; ads feel difficult here - It’s fun now (for me too!) but I think the format will wane
7 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 25 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
If the ultimate aim is to integrate Clubhouse into Facebook's social graph, it doesn't make sense for them to buy it for $10B (they could build it much cheaper, the same way
@TwitterSpaces is). If FB truly wants to keep Clubhouse separate, is it worth buying "6 million users?"4 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 6 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Folks keep saying "Clubhouse could monetize via paid memberships." Have we seen memberships work at a "$10B valuation" scale? The biggest player that I can think of is Patreon, and their annual revenues are currently around $35 million (valued at $1.2B). The scale seems off.
3 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 13 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @mijustin
I just saw the Twitter Spaces experience. It was like Clubhouse but better, with scale and a better UX. I give Clubhouse six months after Twitter Spaces' full release.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione
Yes! I find the experience is better on Spaces.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
building