Clubhouse doesn’t feel like it should be even close to that kind of acquisition price. Facebook bought: Instagram – $1 billion Oculus – $2 billion WhatsApp – $19 billion Giphy – $400 millionhttps://twitter.com/Keith_Wasserman/status/1357697913904717824 …
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
I think a $10B valuation is way too high: - Clubhouse still feels more like a feature that fits on top of an existing graph (Twitter, FB, etc) - Clubhouse currently has no path to monetization; ads feel difficult here - It’s fun now (for me too!) but I think the format will wane
7 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 25 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
If the ultimate aim is to integrate Clubhouse into Facebook's social graph, it doesn't make sense for them to buy it for $10B (they could build it much cheaper, the same way
@TwitterSpaces is). If FB truly wants to keep Clubhouse separate, is it worth buying "6 million users?"4 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 6 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
W odpowiedzi do @typeoneerror @TwitterSpaces
Which acquisitions has made and done that with? Haven't they mostly stuck around/been integrated?
0 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
Yeah, but all those products were integrated. He didn’t just buy them to to destroy them. He bought them because they were a clear path to acquiring more users, and improve ad revenue.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
building