Clubhouse doesn’t feel like it should be even close to that kind of acquisition price. Facebook bought: Instagram – $1 billion Oculus – $2 billion WhatsApp – $19 billion Giphy – $400 millionhttps://twitter.com/Keith_Wasserman/status/1357697913904717824 …
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
I think a $10B valuation is way too high: - Clubhouse still feels more like a feature that fits on top of an existing graph (Twitter, FB, etc) - Clubhouse currently has no path to monetization; ads feel difficult here - It’s fun now (for me too!) but I think the format will wane
7 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 25 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
If the ultimate aim is to integrate Clubhouse into Facebook's social graph, it doesn't make sense for them to buy it for $10B (they could build it much cheaper, the same way
@TwitterSpaces is). If FB truly wants to keep Clubhouse separate, is it worth buying "6 million users?"4 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 6 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Folks keep saying "Clubhouse could monetize via paid memberships." Have we seen memberships work at a "$10B valuation" scale? The biggest player that I can think of is Patreon, and their annual revenues are currently around $35 million (valued at $1.2B). The scale seems off.
3 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 13 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @mijustin
I think they're above $100M ARR fyi.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Noted. (The $1.2b valuation is correct I believe)
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
building