There is no justification for voting for Trump. From every angle, he is contemptible and incompetent.
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
W odpowiedzi do @mijustin
Are you happy to write off 50% of the population, or are they telling you something you just haven’t yet understood?
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 10 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @cforsythdev
At what point can we call a spade a spade, and label a truly incorrigible man as such?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 11 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @mijustin
I can’t answer that without getting into a debate on why someone would or wouldn’t vote for him. But if 50% of people voted for him, you need to question if you have as much information as you think you do. Plenty of people on the other side think they do too.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 6 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @cforsythdev
I said there’s no justification for voting for *him* in particular (not talking Republican be Dem). Do you have a justification you want to stand behind?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @mijustin
You’ve just given one justification, that if you support republicans you hold your nose and go for it. I specifically don’t want to talk about my own views - they’re far too nuanced apparently - why can’t we ask questions without the presumption of a hidden agenda?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @cforsythdev @mijustin
If you can’t see a single reason someone might vote for another party/person, you might be lacking information. If you do see one, then there might be more. I’m just against absolute positions based on fuzzy feelings. Far too much polarisation.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @cforsythdev
This isn’t about “another party/person.” This is about Trump. It’s purely about whether *he* should be the one to hold the highest office, the nuclear codes, the covid response, and the response to climate change.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @mijustin
Appreciate the polite responses but this has diverged so far from the original assertion. You said there was no justification. Some people clearly have a justification, whatever that may be. I’d be happy to chat privately at some point but don’t want to debate trump on Twitter.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony
I see what you’re saying (people clearly have their reasons). If we’re going to get semantic: there’s no *good* justification for voting for Trump.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
building