Do @petersuhm and I disagree here?
Going live in a bit to respond to this.
https://www.youtube.com/justinjackson/live …https://twitter.com/mijustin/status/1315840776618692608 …
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
W odpowiedzi do @mijustin
Matt Wensing 🐙 podał/a dalej Matt Wensing 🐙
Missed the live, but halfway through your response, and the key is Peter’s first sentence. He said he doesn’t need one for
@thisisbranch. And if you don’t need one, you don’t need one, right?https://twitter.com/mattwensing/status/1314712816658644995 …Matt Wensing 🐙 dodał/a,
Matt Wensing 🐙 @mattwensingW odpowiedzi do @lpolovets @amysundaeBest I can do in a tweet: Pro: emotional RAM, vision-sharing, and execution. Cons: immediate loss of control, risk of destruction if relationship fails, equity cut in half for you personally. My belief: if u must have those pros to be viable, absolutely do it. Else def don’t.1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
W odpowiedzi do @mattwensing @thisisbranch
Sorry (this is probably my fault) - I wasn’t trying to make this a hit piece. Folks wanted to know which parts I disagreed with, so I was just talking that out, out loud. I agree that not all startups need (or should have) co-founders.
14:54 - 16 paź 2020
0 odpowiedzi
0 podanych dalej
2 polubione
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
building
conversation near the middle about where or not you should have cofounder. (I disagree with some of it, but some good points made!)