Business ideas are observations paired with hunches. Observation: "This is what people are doing. This is what people want. This is where the market is headed." Hunch: "Here's a way we could help people to get the result they want. (And do it better than what's available)."
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
Execution comes next. But the results of your execution hinge on how good your original idea was. How clear was your initial observation? How correct was your hunch?
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 7 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @mijustin
This misses how most good ideas and results a result from stochastic tinkering. And how most post hoc generalize a top down theory of why the idea worked. For years people scoffed at Semmelweis’s idea to wash hands. He executed why they should - poor results. Was his idea bad?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @FindJimClair
Justin Jackson podał/a dalej
This is my current framework: https://twitter.com/mijustin/status/1256301356727414784?s=21 … https://twitter.com/mijustin/status/1256301356727414784 …
Justin Jackson dodał/a,
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @mijustin
I’m sorry man, but that’s a non-answer. I responded to that too. You’re repeating yourself. In the spirit of respect and camaraderie, I bow out of the conversation.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Scientists and researchers may have many ideas on why an event might be occurring, but they’ll often follow the hunch that shows the most promise. Spreading yourself too thin, and exploring every possible avenue at once, isn’t efficient. Before you start executing, you explore.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
building