I think when it comes to building software, most of us will need a co-founder. It's incredibly demanding and requires a spectrum of skills that are rarely encompassed in a solo person.
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
Since teaming up with
@jonbuda on@transistorfm I've been able to move way faster, and I'm expending less energy than I have in the past. Jon takes care of the things that used to make me spin my wheels.4 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 12 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
There are solo software founders (
@ajlkn,@levelsio,@marckohlbrugge), who are exceptional. (They've also chosen projects that work well for solo founders.) If you have the skillset, timing, and energy to be a solopreneur; go for it!1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 14 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Many of the companies we look up to have multiple founders: - Google (Larry and Sergey) - Basecamp (Jason Fried and DHH) - Fathom (
@pjrvs &@JackEllis) - MailChimp (Ben Chestnut, Dan Kurzius, Mark Armstrong) - Atlassian (Mike Cannon-Brookes, Scott Farquhar) That's no accident!2 odpowiedzi 2 podane dalej 13 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
A good co-founder makes you move faster. Sure, you'll have to give up equity. But the right partnership will grow your business beyond anything you could have done on your own. You'll move faster, but you won't be working as hard.
3 odpowiedzi 4 podane dalej 29 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @mijustin
But research is starting to challenge this assumption: - companies started by solo founders survive longer than those started by teams - organizations started by solo founders generate more revenue - and do not perform different than larger teams https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3107898 …pic.twitter.com/RsYVyl8KCO
3 odpowiedzi 4 podane dalej 22 polubione -
We do know that: Solo founder + employees > Solo founder (for obvious reasons)
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 15 polubionych -
I’ll agree with this. Having solid employees will be as good as having a co-founder - you’ll just have to have different expectations to compensate.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 4 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @CalebJTSmith @mijustin
And less risk, the benefits mentioned by
@mijustin would be similar to the benefits of a great employee or multiple employees. Without the risk to future company operations when they choose to go against you (with 50% voting/ownership).2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione
Yup, a good employee can definitely work too. 
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
building