I think when it comes to building software, most of us will need a co-founder. It's incredibly demanding and requires a spectrum of skills that are rarely encompassed in a solo person.
-
-
Many of the companies we look up to have multiple founders: - Google (Larry and Sergey) - Basecamp (Jason Fried and DHH) - Fathom (
@pjrvs &@JackEllis) - MailChimp (Ben Chestnut, Dan Kurzius, Mark Armstrong) - Atlassian (Mike Cannon-Brookes, Scott Farquhar) That's no accident!Pokaż ten wątek -
A good co-founder makes you move faster. Sure, you'll have to give up equity. But the right partnership will grow your business beyond anything you could have done on your own. You'll move faster, but you won't be working as hard.
Pokaż ten wątek -
Granted, if you would rather hire an employee, that's a good option too. It's less risky, in the sense that you're not "getting married" to someone for a long time. For bootstrappers, it can be harder, because you'll need to have a way of paying someone when you're cash poor.
Pokaż ten wątek -
If you're bootstrapping a software company, and you'd rather be a solopreneur than have a co-founder, then getting funding from someone like
@earnestcapital,@tinyseedfund, or@indievc might be a good option to help you hire someone instead.Pokaż ten wątek -
I like
@b11c's old HN comment here: "Whether you need a co-founder or not is not about individuals, it's about the skills." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17001286 …pic.twitter.com/EQWoZY2JfF
Pokaż ten wątek
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
building