YouTube banned a vegan dude who rescued pigeons and produced carefully worded content specifically designed not to violate their TOS. No reason given.
Ludicrous and proof of flagrant partisan censorship of conservatives.
RT if you think @TeamYouTube should restore his account.
-
-
What are those legal benefits?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The real issue is that YouTube profits off of hosting content that others create. Content creators invest a lot of time and resources into content and building a following in expectation of a profit from monitazation. Platforms can choose which content to host & profit from.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
“they're saying these productions aren't welcome on our platform”. If that isn’t editorial control, how do you define editorial control?
- 5 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.