Alright, @jack / @twitter. You're literally the only major outlet that would publish this. There's a point where you have to let the man be a better President. There's a point when even old school tech Internet freedom nerds need you to.https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/948355557022420992 …
the content of the fireside chat is totally irrelevant, as are donald trump’s policies. my point is jack dorsey isn’t responsible for donald trump speaking, or his shitty behavior, and now that he’s president he will be heard - often - no matter what
-
-
Would the times have quoted this? The journal? The post? Would CNN have played the video? Would Fox? There’s a line somewhere. Just is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yes - literally every single one of them would have (has, at this point?) reported on donald trump implicitly threatening north korea with nuclear weapons
-
Republished. Twitter’s being initial distributer. I didn’t think there was a point where I wouldn’t be ok with that. I mean, I’ve been here for a decade. But you know, this is just not how foreign policy works in the US. And it’s worked pretty well.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
