america has amnesia. nuclear power, space, and who remembers when the virus came from china? memes, by way of viral misinformation, can be dangerous, but nothing is so dangerous as the antimemespace consuming our reality.https://www.piratewires.com/p/variant-xi
-
-
I love nuclear.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
With nuclear as a real solution at scale, alarmists lose purpose and meaning — their secular religion fades out, along with the political gains.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
technically, nuclear counts towards California's clean energy 2045 target, but this only matters after 2030, which presumably was chosen to make sure nuclear was good and dead before including it as clean! clever failed-state energy!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
@EricBeinhocker and J. Doyne Farmer have done some great work showing how the problem with nuclear - in contrast to wind, solar - is the costs aren’t coming down.https://www.inet.ox.ac.uk/news/a-new-strategy-for-climate-make-the-clean-stuff-cheap/ …Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I don't want a solution. I want to be angry!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Deep ecology nihilism
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Same reason progressives hate Musk and Bezos.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I'd argue you are wrong on accepting less. The reality is, we have already locked in a future of adaptation. Energy isn't the only resource. Food, water, material etc will all constrict. Can we honestly depend on technology to solve all/most without cultural/societal shifts?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Nope. They are concerned that it will cause damage to the environment that will last thousands of years, and that profit-motivated corporations, corruptible governments, and fallible engineers can't be trusted to make it safe enough to make that risk tolerable.
-
You can disagree with the probabilities they assign, or disagree about the relative risks of nuclear vs the alternatives, but the core concerns is simply that we'll make a mistake.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
