might be a stupid question, but the problem seems to be congress is trying to spend a couple trillion dollars we don't have on top of the two or three trillion we also probably don't have but are nonetheless spending. what if we simply didn't spend that extra couple tril?
-
Looks like $450B for early childhood education and
@axios reported last night we’ve got $500B for climate. I could do $1T and call it a day for both of those.https://edsource.org/2021/will-bidens-reconciliation-bill-transform-early-childhood-education/661668 …
i could do $1T for *just* carbon sequestration tbh, but this bill isn’t about climate, nor will it move the needle on global warming, which we both know
-
-
The amazing thing is that we've already moved the needle on global warming already, so no, we don't have to be pessimistic or fatalistic.https://twitter.com/hausfath/status/1453396440261095426 …
-
Progressives slammed Obama for his role in the natural gas boom, but it’s made a massive impact in lowering our emissions.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.