might be a stupid question, but the problem seems to be congress is trying to spend a couple trillion dollars we don't have on top of the two or three trillion we also probably don't have but are nonetheless spending. what if we simply didn't spend that extra couple tril?
-
This is just steel manning the bill by saying “look the most important things in the bill are actually worth spending money on” while ignoring the vast portions of the bills that are complete fluff and not important investments like climate and pre-k
i'd say it's more of a mischaracterization the bills than a steelman honestly
-
-
True, mischaracterization that presents the strongest version of their idea which leads any opponent of their argument having to steel man to argue out of it. Which is an issue because no one is arguing for 0 spending, most actually agree with climate and pre-k
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.