Reporters’s opinion ≠ News reporting Newspaper have lost their purpose. They don’t solve a problem. Except maybe The Economist.
nyt still does a great job with some hard reporting imo (covid, china, ufos). but the institutional press can no longer afford the most interesting opinions. substack swallowed the op-ed.https://twitter.com/rkylesmith/status/1436401352872271872 …
-
-
-
Financial Times is great too
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But they have something more important - the distribution. You can have the most amazing voices on Substack, but they won't be heard out there by many people who should hear them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s a healthy divide that can improve things going forward.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, NYT is not interested in sharing certain opinions. It's a fairly ideologically driven paper.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only thing NYT is good for is recipes, maybe.
-
Crosswords are still fire.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Will they be able to support this journalism after losing subscribers?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You’re not wrong holistically but “Bari Weiss” and “most interesting opinions” are not two things I’d associate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
potentially interesting divide going forward…move opinion elsewhere. Not sure what percentage of subscribers pay for a paper because of the opinion writers?
-
Unfortunately, no way for NYT to run A/B tests.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.