sure, the press should call it parasite medicine commonly used in both humans and animals that the AMA strongly opposes for covid treatment but any press criticism ought to hold in perspective the fact that team ivermectin's advocacy is more damaging than horsey drug headlines
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
I too do not understand why “it’s being wrongly described” is more relevant for some of you than “it’s a snake oil covid cure.” It’s detractors in the media are too obsessed with it, but it’s boosters (ie the Weinsteins) are more obsessed and also more wrong.
i've seen studies indicating efficacy, i've seen one large study retracted. many studies still ongoing. it's not even close to snakeoil, we just don't know. if i worked in media i would simply acknowledge what i don't know, and stop lying to the public for 'their own good'
-
-
to be generous, I would say ivermectin is interesting, like many under-studied drugs are interesting, but we have several vaccines, monoclonal ab treatments, and side-effect-mitigating drugs with clearly superior clinical and real-world results (1/2)
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.