sure, the press should call it parasite medicine commonly used in both humans and animals that the AMA strongly opposes for covid treatment but any press criticism ought to hold in perspective the fact that team ivermectin's advocacy is more damaging than horsey drug headlines
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I too do not understand why “it’s being wrongly described” is more relevant for some of you than “it’s a snake oil covid cure.” It’s detractors in the media are too obsessed with it, but it’s boosters (ie the Weinsteins) are more obsessed and also more wrong.
i've seen studies indicating efficacy, i've seen one large study retracted. many studies still ongoing. it's not even close to snakeoil, we just don't know. if i worked in media i would simply acknowledge what i don't know, and stop lying to the public for 'their own good'
-
-
to be generous, I would say ivermectin is interesting, like many under-studied drugs are interesting, but we have several vaccines, monoclonal ab treatments, and side-effect-mitigating drugs with clearly superior clinical and real-world results (1/2)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.