NEWS: Only Fans reverses course on adult content policy changes “The proposed October 1, 2021 changes are no longer required due to banking partners' assurances that OnlyFans can support all genres of creators.” — OF spokeswoman
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
read
@BernsteinJacob for more from the creators and the pushbackhttps://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/25/style/onlyfans-ban-reversed.html …3 vastausta 7 uudelleentwiittausta 40 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
the
@OnlyFans strategy thus far has been to point the finger at the banks only to reverse course after five days of backlash. Unclear on what, if anything, changed on the banking side. no comments all around9 vastausta 8 uudelleentwiittausta 82 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MikeIsaac ja @OnlyFans
banking is a well known problem across the entire adult entertainment industry. i don't understand this line of questioning from the tech press honestly. what could possibly be the "sell out" purpose of removing porn from your massively popular porn platform?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 11 tykkäystä -
what are they "selling out" for? this destroys their business. they obviously don't want to do it.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 6 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @micsolana ja @OnlyFans
dont understand what "selling out" means here. is that a phrase someone else is using?
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MikeIsaac ja @OnlyFans
right, i'm talking the tech story generally, both from the verge where "selling out" was used explicitly and the new york times' first story on this, which concluded with the below quote. in context, i assumed you were suspicious of the banking reason. are you not?pic.twitter.com/kCqm2x2KjI
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @micsolana ja @OnlyFans
ah. i dont think unreasonable to suspect they got shut off by banks. agree history is well documented Just have not confirmed yet outside of OF statement, which gives little detail (thus far I have not written on this in article form)
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
what you sensed there was my frustration on how little OF has said publicly while promising more info to come. my guess is the "sell out" stuff you hear is from creators who feel spurned
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Some speculated that the move was motivated by trying to raise money from investors who didn't want to be involved in porn, no? Not saying this was the actual reason, but it's what explains the "sellout" narrative.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä
right, people keep saying this but it makes no sense. what exactly would investors being investing in here without adult content? it’s a platform for adult content. that’s why it’s popular. no one is unaware of this fact.
-
-
People love to comment on things while lacking a fundamental understanding of the subject ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystäKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
