“onlyfans owner only cares about money.” no, but also he was already making a shit ton of money. “VCs are too puritanical.” lmao no. what? “onlyfans guy thinks he’s patreon,” which… was worth less than onlyfans. banking is the issue, and it’s not a joke. extrapolate.
-
-
Näytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Also the "evil corporate is turning its back on independent creators because it wants VC money" takes.
-
I don’t even see the issue here. The card schemes are private companies. Surely this is the free market perfectly allocating resources??
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
How irrational would be me supporting the onlyfans move because I don't like the idea but I also hating the fact that banks dictates which business has access to modern financial products.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
the Taliban are now in control of onlyfans
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I’m honestly surprised they didn’t dive into crypto payments, they would be a perfect use case. I guess the banks must’ve threatened to do more than just stop facilitating payments
-
The OF press release mentions “payout partners” ie: banks. Which makes me think they threatened a Chexsystem ban. Worst case nobody working for or running the company could open a bank account in the US.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Hi Mike have you heard of business journalists? I thought you were a media tycoon and you knew this is basic standard reporting.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
