every time i criticize the san francisco left’s obsession with violence i’m gaslit by socialists — “reading classic literature is not endorsement!” this is the socialist party. their description of lenin is “crucial.” at what point are we allowed to take them at their word?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2 replies both about the downside. I assume this is self selective ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In attendance:
@DeanPreston@MattHaneySF Probably@HillaryRonen Definitely@chesaboudin And othersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
im pretty sure you were afraid to ask Lenin because he'd just answer "face wall now"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why are tankies?!?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Humanity is doomed to repeat the same mistakes over & over bc young people don’t read enough history.
-
“Lenin and Stalin were just misunderstood” is quite the take
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Love the idea that the same people who want to cancel the average American President for passing associations with past bad things, want us to view their genocidal heroes in a nuanced, contextual light.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They'd probably feature Stalin's writings too, but they were mostly just enemies lists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They might also want to read up on the Great Purge, or the Cultural Revolution.
-
they’re aware, the murder is their favorite part
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
