billionaire media tycoon and mayor of san francisco. vp @foundersfund. ringleader @hereticon. editor-in-chief @piratewires 
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
think of the good we could do if our political leaders were interested in doing good
libertarians are mad at me for this but 1) you will never make a political impact without a compelling vision for the future 2) losing is part of the libertarian identity, which is why i'm no longer interested in advice from libertarians, and 3) roads are good, actually
What do you think about removing reelection and making the periods 5-7 years instead? Feels like reelection promotes thinking short term (getting votes), rather than working for the long term (even if to be remembered as someone who did good in history).
...or they were simply interested in serving the people rather than ruling over them...
think of . . . utopia and ignore the reality of self-serving politicians and the malign incentives of those in government.
politicians convinced that they were doing good also took us to the moon and split the atom
^ incentivized to do good, FTFY. The power of incentives dominates any kind of intrinsic benevolent motivations.
Or even better we assume that men are not angels and we pit ambition against ambition as described in federalist 51
We had a system for this and a step towards restoring it would be creating a Senate that is appointed by members of their own state's legislature rather than direct elections.
Could do everything from a genocide to a moon mission.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
